Untitled Document

The evaluations for this webquest will be of two types: individual and group.

Peer evaluations will be carried out by fellow colleagues for each individual work but groups will evaluate other group's presentations. The teacher will also provide feedback to the students based on the assessment rubric below. Observations made by the teacher will also be crucial for a judgement on you teamwork.

Do not let the grade limit your imagination! Think of all the important concepts, skills and experiences you have had while doing this webquest.

Grade	Excellent (A)	Satisfactory (B)	Poor (C)
Scientific naming and its format-background information	Links to general Biological classification and Latin origin. Provides a synthethised one paragraph definition with description of appropriate format and pronunciation guidelines.	One paragraph description with mention of general Biological classification and Latin origins.	No mention of the general Biological classification and Latin origins.
Writing Scientific names-activity	Able to locate all the 4 names on the web. The names are presented in the correct format and pronunciation is provided.	Able to locate 2 of the 4 names. Pronunciation is given for these names with correct formatting of the names.	Unable to locate more than 1 of the names. Improper formatting and no indication of pronunciation
Report and presentation	Offer a logical conclusion and support with more than 3 reasons. The presentation is effective with use of many different aids. Great collaboration within the team.	Offer little explanation of their choice-little or no indication of proper preparation for presentation. Use of aids in presentation. Some teamwork demonstrated.	Not sufficient explanation for the decision-inconclusive. Poor preparation of presentation. No aids used for presentation and poor team work.