Skip to content

Citing the best source

Cite a source that strongly supports your point, rather than one that just mentions the idea briefly. 

For example, how could you cite to support this sentence?

“The colour vision system of flies involves two types of photoreceptors, allowing perception of four colour categories.”

You could cite the original study that discovered flies have two photoreceptor types (Hardie & Kirschfeld 1983) or a paper that reviews all the literature on fly vision (Lunau 2014). Don’t cite a study that mentions the idea but focusses on a slightly different hypothesis, eg, Kelly & Gaskett (2014), which tests how flower colours are seen by flies, but provides no new data on fly vision.

This tiny NZ orchid's intense UV is invisible to humans but super bright to flies! (Kelly & Gaskett 2014)


Hardie, R. C. & Kirschfeld, K. (1983). Ultraviolet sensitivity of fly photoreceptors R7 and R8: Evidence for a sensitising function. Biophysics of Structure and Mechanism, 9, 171-180.
Kelly, M. M. & Gaskett, A.C. (2014). UV reflectance but no evidence for colour mimicry in a putative brood-deceptive orchid Corybas cheesemanii. Current Zoology, 60, 104-113.
Lunau, K. (2014). Visual ecology of flies with particular reference to colour vision and colour preferences. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 200, 497-512.

 
    
Add paper Cornell note Whiteboard Recorder Download Close
PIP mode
Edit page