Skip to content

Think of Goldilocks and the three bowls of porridge - one too hot, one too cold, one just right, or one too much, one too little and one just the right amount. To get just the right amount of information when you search databases or Google to answer your assignment question...

  • Think of the searching process as like testing the water.1
  • The words you choose to use are important.
  • Start with obvious key words. If you get less than 5 results, browse them looking for clues such as new words in article titles and abstracts, author keywords and any MeSH or subject headings, and use these in a new search.
  • Try different word combinations.
  • Have another look at Too many results and Too few results and adjust your search.
  • Use pearl growing techniques.
  • The searching process is exploratory and not always linear. Expect backtracks, sidetracks and dead ends.2

'Be aware that databases tend to be something of a black hole. You send in a request and the database tells you what it found (not what it didn't find). The database search program will rarely let you know what you did wrong or what might actually be available if you did a better search. It won't give you three 6.5's and an 8 like Olympic judges do. The data you want could well be in there, but you won't know that unless you vary your search strategies to draw it out'

Badke, W. B. (2014). Research strategies: Finding your way through the information fog (5th ed., p. 117). Bloomington, IN: iUniverse.

Helpful article.

Watson M. How to undertake a literature search: a step-by-step guide.Br J Nurs. 2020;29(7):431–435. doi:10.12968/bjon.2020.29.7.431

The key message from your searching in Google or any database is to think about the words you use and how you enter them in a database, AND unless you are using Google or Google Scholar, check your spelling.

1. Duncan V, Holtslander L. Utilizing grounded theory to explore the information-seeking behavior of senior nursing students. J Med Libr Assoc. 2012;100(1):20-7.
2. Jones S, Allen J. Evaluating psychology students library skills and experiences. Psychol Teach Rev. 2012;18(2):94-115.


Edit page
    
Add paper Cornell note Whiteboard Recorder Download Close
PIP mode